Collision Frequency and Collision Cross-Section
Hard-sphere model, reduced mass and collision density
Lesson 3107 of 4,500 · Kinetics and Reaction Dynamics
Learning objectives
- Derive the geometric hard-sphere collision cross-section
- Calculate an A–B collision count per unit volume and time
- Distinguish all collisions from reactive collisions
Introduction
Kinetic theory says gas molecules collide, but a reaction-rate estimate needs to count how often. A hard-sphere model treats molecules as spheres with fixed radii and asks when their centres come close enough to touch. The resulting collision cross-section combines with number densities and mean relative speed to estimate total encounter frequency. Only a fraction of those encounters may have the energy and orientation needed for chemistry, so collision count is a starting point rather than a full rate law.
Core explanation
Let molecules A and B have effective hard-sphere radii r A and r B. Their centres collide when the closest approach is r A+r B or less. From the viewpoint of relative motion, B presents a circular target of radius r A+r B. Its geometric cross-section is therefore σ AB = π(r A+r B)². The unit is area, usually m². The effective radii are model parameters, not sharp physical boundaries of an electron cloud. Intermolecular forces can make actual scattering cross-sections depend on speed and differ from the geometric estimate. A NIST kinetic-theory reference contrasts rigid-sphere size with corrections for intermolecular forces.
For a dilute mixture with distinct A and B molecules, let n A and n B be their number densities in molecules m⁻³. In a simple uncorrelated hard-sphere gas, the number of A–B encounters per unit volume per second is Z AB = n A n B σ AB⟨v rel⟩. Check units: (molecules m⁻³)² × m² × m s⁻¹ gives pair encounters m⁻³ s⁻¹ after treating molecule counts as dimensionless entities. No factor of one-half is used for distinct A–B pairs because each pair appears once in the product n A n B. For identical A–A pairs, a one-half factor prevents double-counting the same pair in a corresponding simple pair-count formula.
The mean relative speed at common temperature T for Maxwellian particles is ⟨v rel⟩ = √(8k BT/(πμ)), with reduced mass μ = m A m B/(m A+m B). Thus, at fixed number densities and hard-sphere radii, Z AB scales as √T and as 1/√μ. The number densities themselves can change with temperature if pressure is held fixed, so a complete comparison must state what is held constant. At fixed ideal-gas pressure, n = p/(k BT) falls as T rises; that can offset some collision-frequency increase from speed.
One A molecule has a collision frequency with B of approximately z A,B = n Bσ AB⟨v rel⟩ in this simple model. Multiply by n A to get the bulk collision density. If each encounter reacted with probability one, this would set a collision-limited upper estimate for a bimolecular gas reaction. In reality, many encounters are elastic or nonreactive. Their relative translational energy, impact parameter, orientation and internal states affect chemical probability. Later pages add energy and steric factors. The OpenStax collision-theory chapter explains why encounter frequency alone is insufficient.
Consider r A = r B = 0.15 nm, so the centre-to-centre contact distance is 0.30 nm = 3.0×10⁻¹⁰ m. Then σ AB = π(3.0×10⁻¹⁰ m)² ≈ 2.83×10⁻¹⁹ m². If ⟨v rel⟩ = 500 m s⁻¹, n A = 1.0×10²⁰ m⁻³ and n B = 2.0×10²⁰ m⁻³, then Z AB ≈ 2.83×10²⁴ encounters m⁻³ s⁻¹. A large number is plausible because a cubic metre contains enormous numbers of particles. It says nothing yet about product formation.
Cross-sections in experimental scattering can be more nuanced. A measured reactive cross-section counts only trajectories producing a specified product and may vary strongly with collision energy. A total scattering cross-section may include trajectories that turn without the hard-sphere contact imagined in this model. The geometric disk is pedagogically useful but not a universal molecular constant. Attractive long-range forces or charged reactants especially challenge it.
Step-by-step reasoning
1. Identify the collision partner pair and their effective radii or diameter. 2. Add radii to find the centre-to-centre contact distance. 3. Square that distance and multiply by π to get geometric σ AB. 4. Calculate mean relative speed using temperature and reduced mass if needed. 5. Multiply σ AB⟨v rel⟩ by the appropriate number densities. 6. State whether the result counts all encounters or only reactive events.
Visual explanation
Draw A fixed at the origin and B approaching with a relative-velocity arrow. Around A, draw a dashed circle of radius r A+r B for B's centre; trajectories crossing the projected disk count as hard-sphere collisions. Label the disk area π(r A+r B)². Beside it, show a small box of gas containing many A and B particles to connect single-pair geometry to the bulk factor n A n B.
Real-world analogy
To estimate how often moving balls hit a target, consider how large the target looks and how many balls pass per second. A larger target area, denser stream or faster relative motion raises encounters. Molecules follow a similar geometric count in the hard-sphere approximation, although their interactions can extend beyond a sharp visible surface and chemistry adds energy and orientation requirements.
Real-world example
A gas-phase reaction model may predict many A–B collisions from known temperature, pressure and molecular-size estimates but observe much slower product formation. The gap suggests that only a small fraction of collisions are reactive under those conditions. An experiment that changes temperature can then probe whether a barrier or orientation requirement explains the difference, rather than changing the hard-sphere area to force a fit.
Why?
Why does the hard-sphere cross-section use the sum of radii rather than the radius of B alone? Both molecules occupy space. Their surfaces touch when centres are separated by r A+r B. In relative motion, treating A's centre as fixed enlarges the effective target for B's centre to exactly that summed radius.
Common misconception
“Every collision counted by Z AB produces a reaction.” Most collisions may fail to cross a barrier or align correctly. Another common error is using σ = 4πr², the surface area of a sphere, for a collision target. The incoming relative trajectory sees a projected disk, so the geometric cross-section is π(r A+r B)².
Worked example
Take r A = r B = 0.15 nm. Their contact separation is 0.30 nm = 3.0×10⁻¹⁰ m, so σ AB = π(3.0×10⁻¹⁰)² = 2.83×10⁻¹⁹ m². With n A = 1.0×10²⁰ m⁻³, n B = 2.0×10²⁰ m⁻³ and mean relative speed 500 m s⁻¹, Z AB = (1.0×10²⁰)(2.0×10²⁰)(2.83×10⁻¹⁹)(500) ≈ 2.83×10²⁴ A–B encounters m⁻³ s⁻¹. If only one in 10⁶ encounters reacts, the corresponding simplified reactive-event density would be 2.83×10¹⁸ m⁻³ s⁻¹.
Quick check
1. Why is there no factor ½ in n A n B σ⟨v rel⟩ for distinct species A and B? Answer: Each A–B pair is counted once; the half-factor is needed when identical-particle pair counting would count each pair twice.
Exam focus
Convert nanometres to metres before squaring. Use a projected disk area, not a sphere surface area. Track whether concentrations are number densities or molar concentrations; adding Avogadro's constant incorrectly can change an answer by many orders of magnitude. State the assumptions of dilute, uncorrelated hard spheres and separate collision frequency from chemical rate.
Advanced insight
The reactive cross-section can be expressed as an integral over impact parameters that lead to products. At a particular collision energy, some glancing approaches may react while some nearly head-on approaches do not, depending on the potential-energy surface and internal state. The thermal rate constant then averages energy-dependent cross-section times relative speed over a distribution. This is a more general picture than assigning one fixed hard-sphere area and one universal reaction probability.
Summary
The hard-sphere model gives σ AB = π(r A+r B)² for a distinct molecular pair. Combined with number densities and mean relative speed, it estimates total A–B encounters per volume and time. Reduced mass and temperature set relative-speed trends, while pressure conditions can change number density. The geometric count does not predict product formation without a reactive probability or energy-dependent cross-section.
Practice questions
1. What is the geometric cross-section if r A+r B = 0.40 nm? Answer: σ = π(4.0×10⁻¹⁰ m)² ≈ 5.03×10⁻¹⁹ m². 2. At fixed n A, n B and σ, what happens to Z AB if mean relative speed doubles? Answer: It doubles, because Z AB is directly proportional to ⟨v rel⟩. 3. Why may fixed-pressure heating fail to increase total collision density as √T? Answer: Number density decreases with temperature at fixed ideal-gas pressure, altering the n A n B factors. 4. What additional information is needed to estimate reactive encounters? Answer: The probability of reaction or a reactive cross-section as a function of collision energy and geometry.