The Kelvin Equation and Ostwald Ripening
Vapour pressure and solubility of small droplets and particles
Lesson 3933 of 4,500 · Surface Chemistry, Colloids and Nanochemistry
Learning objectives
- Use the Kelvin equation to compare curved and flat vapour pressures
- Explain why small particles can feed growth of larger ones
- Distinguish Ostwald ripening from particle coalescence
Introduction
Small droplets do not behave exactly like flat pools of the same liquid. Their high curvature increases the pressure inside and raises the chemical potential of their molecules. At equilibrium, the vapour pressure above a convex droplet is consequently greater than above a flat surface. When many droplet sizes share one vapour or solution, this difference can move material from smaller to larger objects. This coarsening mechanism is called Ostwald ripening and matters for aerosols, emulsions and nanomaterials.
Core explanation
For an ideal vapour above a spherical liquid droplet, neglecting several nonideal effects, the Kelvin equation is ln[p(r)/p(∞)] = 2γVₘ/(rRT) . Here p(r) is equilibrium vapour pressure over a droplet of radius r, p(∞) is pressure over a flat interface, γ is liquid–vapour tension, Vₘ is liquid molar volume, R is the gas constant and T the absolute temperature. All factors on the right are positive for a convex droplet, so p(r) > p(∞). As r decreases, the ratio increases. For a concave meniscus the sign of curvature is reversed under an appropriate radius convention; the equilibrium vapour pressure can then be lower than over a plane.
The equation can be understood from chemical-potential equality. The Young–Laplace pressure increase 2γ/r raises the liquid chemical potential approximately by Vₘ(2γ/r) if the liquid is nearly incompressible. Raising ideal-vapour pressure from p(∞) to p(r) raises vapour chemical potential by RT ln[p(r)/p(∞)]. Equating these increments yields the relation. It is an equilibrium relation, not a formula for how fast the droplet evaporates. Rate also depends on diffusion, interfacial kinetics and heat transfer.
An analogous curvature argument often raises the equilibrium solubility of a small solid particle or dispersed liquid droplet in a surrounding phase. If a small particle and a large one share a medium whose concentration lies between their respective equilibrium concentrations, the small one tends to lose material and the large one gains it. Molecules travel through the common medium; the particles need not touch. That is Ostwald ripening. Direct collision and fusion are coalescence , a different growth route. Both may operate at once in a real dispersion, so microscopy or kinetic evidence is needed to assign the dominant mechanism.
This simple Kelvin form assumes a spherical droplet, a constant γ, an incompressible condensed phase and a sufficiently ideal vapour. Molecular-size particles, multicomponent droplets, surfactant-coated surfaces and solids with facet-dependent energies can deviate. The qualitative inverse-radius tendency remains a valuable first model but should not be used to claim quantitative predictions outside its assumptions.
Step-by-step reasoning
Identify whether the interface is convex or concave with respect to the condensed phase. Check the particle radius, not diameter, and convert all quantities to SI units. Calculate the dimensionless right side, exponentiate if a pressure ratio is needed, and judge whether the effect is appreciable. To analyse coarsening, compare equilibrium concentrations near different radii and identify a path for mass transport. Ask explicitly whether growth occurs by dissolved or vapour-phase transfer, or by direct merger.
Visual explanation
Draw two droplets, one small and one large, separated by a continuous vapour phase. Above the small droplet write a higher equilibrium p and above the large droplet a lower p. Draw arrows of molecules leaving the small droplet, diffusing across the gap and joining the large one. In a second small diagram, draw two droplets touching and fusing; label that coalescence, not Ostwald ripening.
Real-world analogy
Imagine two water reservoirs at different heights connected by a channel: material can flow from the higher-energy location to the lower one without the reservoirs colliding. The smaller droplet is analogous to the higher chemical-potential reservoir. The analogy is limited because the relevant driving quantity is molecular chemical potential, not a literal gravitational height.
Real-world example
A nanoparticle dispersion can gradually lose its smallest particles while the average size of remaining particles grows. In one experimental setting, silica nanoparticle dissolution data have been compared with thermodynamic models incorporating ripening. In emulsions, an oil with appreciable solubility in water can diffuse between droplets and accelerate the same process. Adding a barrier or choosing a less soluble dispersed material can slow it, but the outcome depends on the full formulation.
Why?
Why does a small droplet have higher equilibrium vapour pressure? Its surface has a larger curvature and area-to-volume ratio. The positive energy cost of its interface raises the chemical potential of material within it relative to a large, nearly flat reservoir. A vapour with a higher pressure is required to balance that higher chemical potential at equilibrium.
Common misconception
Ostwald ripening is not the same as droplets simply bumping together. Ripening transfers molecular material through a shared phase; coalescence directly merges objects. Also, Kelvin's equation does not say every small droplet must instantly disappear. It sets a thermodynamic tendency; barriers and transport rates can make change slow.
Worked example
Question: At 298 K take γ = 0.072 N m⁻¹ and water Vₘ = 18 × 10⁻⁶ m³ mol⁻¹. Estimate p(r)/p(∞) for r = 10 nm using the ideal Kelvin equation.
Reasoning: The exponent is 2γVₘ/(rRT) = 2(0.072)(18 × 10⁻⁶)/[(10 × 10⁻⁹)(8.314)(298)] ≈ 0.105. Exponentiating gives exp(0.105) ≈ 1.11. The effect is roughly an 11% increase for this idealised 10 nm droplet; the radius is 10 nm, not the diameter.
Answer: p(r)/p(∞) ≈ 1.11 under the model assumptions.
Quick check
1. Does the Kelvin equation predict higher or lower equilibrium vapour pressure above a small convex droplet than above a flat liquid surface? Answer: Higher, because the positive curvature raises condensed-phase chemical potential.
Exam focus
Know the sign and inverse-radius dependence of ln[p(r)/p(∞)]. Check that the Kelvin exponent is dimensionless and use kelvin for T. Explain the driving force of ripening in terms of different equilibrium chemical potentials or solubilities. Distinguish the mass-transfer route from coalescence before interpreting size-distribution data.
Advanced insight
Classical ripening models predict characteristic time laws only after specifying whether transport is diffusion-limited or interface-limited and assuming a particle-size distribution. A measured increase in mean radius alone cannot prove a particular law. Surfactant adsorption may change γ with radius or time, and nanoscale solids can have anisotropic facet energies, so a single constant-γ spherical equation can be an inadequate quantitative model.
Summary
The Kelvin equation relates positive droplet curvature to higher equilibrium vapour pressure. A similar curvature penalty can increase small-particle solubility. This creates a thermodynamic route for material to move from small to large particles through a common medium, producing Ostwald ripening. It differs from direct coalescence, and its rate depends on transport as well as thermodynamics.
Practice questions
1. What happens to the ideal Kelvin pressure ratio when droplet radius increases? Answer: It approaches one as the surface becomes flatter. 2. Why can a small dispersed particle shrink beside a larger one? Answer: Its greater curvature can give it higher equilibrium solubility, driving material through the medium toward the larger particle. 3. What observation distinguishes coalescence from ripening in a direct movie? Answer: Coalescence shows particles touch and merge; ripening can show small particles shrink and large ones grow without direct contact. 4. Is the Kelvin equation a direct evaporation-rate equation? Answer: No. It describes an equilibrium pressure difference; rates also require diffusion and interfacial-kinetic information.
Primary research context: thermodynamic and dissolution study of nanoparticles and direct emulsion-growth control study.