Displayed Formulae and Other Ways to Show Molecules
Lines for bonds, molecular formulae and 3D models
Lesson 599 of 4,500 · Chemical Bonding: Ionic and Covalent
Learning objectives
- Translate among molecular, displayed and electron formulas
- Identify which structural information each representation omits
Introduction
A molecule can be described by its composition, connectivity, electron pairs or three-dimensional arrangement. Different formulas and models emphasise these different features. Translating between them is useful only when we preserve the available information and avoid inventing details that the starting representation does not provide, such as assuming one unique structure from a molecular formula alone.
Core explanation
A molecular formula states the number of atoms of each element in one molecule. C₂H₆O tells us there are two carbons, six hydrogens and one oxygen. It does not uniquely specify how those atoms connect. Ethanol and dimethyl ether share this molecular formula but have different connectivity.
A displayed formula shows atoms and bonds explicitly. Each ordinary line represents one shared electron pair, two lines a double bond and three a triple bond. A dot-and-cross or Lewis electron drawing can add lone pairs and electron accounting that a displayed formula may leave implicit.
Condensed formulas group parts of a structure. CH₃CH₂OH indicates ethanol's carbon–carbon–oxygen sequence, whereas CH₃OCH₃ indicates an oxygen between two carbon groups. Their identical overall atom counts do not make these condensed formulas interchangeable.
Three-dimensional models provide information about geometry. Ball-and-stick models expose bond directions and angles; space-filling models emphasise the region occupied by atoms. Wedge-and-dash drawings communicate depth on a flat page. A solid wedge commonly points towards the viewer, a dashed bond away, and an ordinary line lies approximately in the drawing plane.
Every representation uses conventions. Sticks are not literal material rods, colours require a key and sphere surfaces are simplified boundaries. A flat cross-shaped methane drawing does not establish a 90° bond angle. Similarly, a molecular formula cannot independently establish which atoms are neighbours, whether a species is an isomer of another or the exact shape of a flexible molecule.
Step-by-step reasoning
1. Identify what the supplied representation explicitly states: counts, connections, electrons or geometry. 2. Count atoms and bond orders carefully before translating. 3. Add lone pairs or three-dimensional information only when justified by the known structure and electron model. 4. Check that the new representation preserves composition and connectivity, and flag any ambiguity that the original formula cannot resolve.
Visual explanation
Place H₂O, H–O–H and a bent water model side by side. Add two oxygen lone pairs only in the electron diagram. Label the three questions they answer: “what atoms?”, “which connections?” and “what shape?”
Real-world analogy
A recipe's ingredient list, assembly instructions and photograph describe different aspects of the same dish. The ingredient list alone does not show the finished arrangement. Molecular formulas, displayed structures and spatial models similarly carry different levels of information.
Real-world example
Ethanol and dimethyl ether both have formula C₂H₆O, yet their different atom connections lead to different properties and chemistry. Structural formulas distinguish them directly, illustrating why identifying a substance often requires more than knowing its elemental composition.
Why?
Why does a line stand for two electrons rather than one? It is a compact convention for a shared pair in a covalent bond. Replacing a dot-and-cross pair with one line simplifies the picture without halving the electron count.
Common misconception
“A formula containing the same element counts describes the same substance.” Different arrangements can produce isomers. Matching composition is necessary for a molecular formula match but does not establish identical connectivity or three-dimensional configuration.
Worked example
Translate H₂C=CH₂ into a molecular formula and an electron-pair count. Two carbon atoms and four hydrogens give C₂H₄. Four C–H single bonds contribute four pairs, and the C=C double bond contributes two more, giving six bonding pairs and twelve valence electrons. The molecular formula alone would not visibly display those six pairs.
Quick check
1. Which representation most directly distinguishes CH₃CH₂OH from CH₃OCH₃: their shared molecular formula or their connectivity formulas? Answer: Their connectivity formulas, because they show the different arrangement of carbon and oxygen atoms.
Exam focus
Provide the representation requested. A molecular formula is not a substitute when every bond must be displayed, and a displayed formula without lone pairs may be incomplete when a full electron diagram is requested.
Advanced insight
Skeletal formulas omit many carbon labels and carbon-bound hydrogens by convention. They become efficient for larger organic molecules, but require careful reading of line ends and vertices. Their omissions are agreed shorthand rather than evidence that the omitted atoms are absent.
Summary
Molecular formulas give atom counts, displayed formulas give connections and bond orders, electron diagrams add pair information, and spatial models show geometry. Translate without losing composition or inventing unsupported details. Different structures can share the same molecular formula.
Practice questions
1. What does each line in a standard single covalent bond represent? Answer: One shared pair of electrons. 2. Why does a flat methane cross not prove that methane is square planar? Answer: It shows connectivity; the real three-dimensional arrangement is tetrahedral. 3. Count the atoms in CH₃OCH₃. Answer: Two carbons, six hydrogens and one oxygen, giving molecular formula C₂H₆O.